Hi
Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> +static void rt2800_init_rfcsr_305x_soc(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> +{
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 0, 0x50);
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 1, 0x01);
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 2, 0xf7);
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 3, 0x75);
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 4, 0x40);
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 5, 0x03);
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 6, 0x02);
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 7, 0x50);
Wouldn't a table based initialization be more readable and also shorter?
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
