On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 10:47 +0100, Andy Green wrote: > > Well, for one, the PS code is only relevant if we're ourselves operating > > in IBSS or AP mode. If we're operating in AP/IBSS mode we'll also > > automatically buffer your injected multicast frames for after the DTIM > > beacon. I think we should just buffer injected unicast frames as well, > > it won't hurt your use case (multicast destination) and makes things > > more consistent. > > Fine by me. Good. I'll look at it later or next week. > There are other problems hiding somewhere, perhaps iwl3945, as well. > Having a secondary network interface like mon0 in Monitor mode is still > not quite the same as having the primary network interface in Monitor mode. Definitely iwlwifi. Might be caused by going into power management mode though, not much you can do about it then. But that reminds me of something I need to check. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
