On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 15:08 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Wednesday 27 June 2007 10:55:00 Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 16:28 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > > > case PRISM2_PARAM_PREAMBLE: > > > - local->short_preamble = value; > > > + if (value) > > > + local_to_hw(local)->conf.flags |= IEEE80211_CONF_SHORT_PREAMBLE; > > > + else > > > + local_to_hw(local)->conf.flags &= ~IEEE80211_CONF_SHORT_PREAMBLE; > > > + if (ieee80211_hw_config(local)) > > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > > > any reason not to return the actual error code from hw_config here? Not > > that it'll be any different from -EINVAL I expect... > > The reason is copy&paste from other PRISM2 IOCTLs ;) > I'm OK with the real error code, too. I don't really care either way. > Though, the error code of hw_config is usually not useful _at all_. > As it might not be the SHORT_PRMBL flag that produced it, but some of the > other config settings. > I would probably vote for any code in mac80211 to ignore that return value, > except the places where a failure of hw_config would be fatal (init or > places like that). Yeah, there's a todo item saying that we need a way to just commit the changed settings. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part