Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 10:59 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
I do not think this particular rate control algorithm is needed. A patch has been submitted that
will allow the user to use the SIOCSIWRATE ioctl to lock in a rate. In addition, a patch that
changes rc80211_simple to set the initial rate to the lowest supported value has also been
submitted. With these two alternatives, everything that this proposed module does is supported in
other ways.
Ok.
Actually, I'd vote for having this rate control algorithm anyway because
it's basically a rate control algorithm template you can copy and
modify. rc80211_simple is quite a bit more sophisticated over that.
johannes
If the comments include the idea that this is an template for the rate control mechanism, I withdraw
my objection.
Larry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
