On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 10:59 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > > I do not think this particular rate control algorithm is needed. A patch has been submitted that > > will allow the user to use the SIOCSIWRATE ioctl to lock in a rate. In addition, a patch that > > changes rc80211_simple to set the initial rate to the lowest supported value has also been > > submitted. With these two alternatives, everything that this proposed module does is supported in > > other ways. > > Ok. Actually, I'd vote for having this rate control algorithm anyway because it's basically a rate control algorithm template you can copy and modify. rc80211_simple is quite a bit more sophisticated over that. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
