On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:32:33 -0700, jketreno wrote: > It doesn't really look like he invented a 'new useless' prefix. It looks > to me like he picked a prefix that correlates attribution of the data > declaration to the entity that created it. You may not like that he > provided attribution, but that doesn't mean its useless. By "useless", I meant "if you use a WLAN_ prefix like in all other #defines in that file, it will do the same job". Ok, I understand the argument about attribution, but it shouldn't be in exchange of consistency and clarity. > If you'd rather use a different prefix, send a patch to fix it. I'd appreciate if you use a WLAN_ prefix in the next respin of the patch. > Who holds 'WIFI' as a registered trademark? Wi-Fi Alliance? Ok, it's "Wi-Fi", but you can use only capitals in macros and you cannot use dash, so it looks really similar. Thanks, Jiri -- Jiri Benc SUSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
