On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:49:09AM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:32:33 -0700, jketreno wrote: > > It doesn't really look like he invented a 'new useless' prefix. It looks > > to me like he picked a prefix that correlates attribution of the data > > declaration to the entity that created it. You may not like that he > > provided attribution, but that doesn't mean its useless. > > By "useless", I meant "if you use a WLAN_ prefix like in all other #defines > in that file, it will do the same job". Ok, I understand the argument about > attribution, but it shouldn't be in exchange of consistency and clarity. WLAN_ prefix is currently mostly (only?) used for values defined in IEEE 802.11 while the WMM parameters are defined in WFA specification, not IEEE 802.11. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
