On Thursday 10 May 2007 12:39, Larry Finger wrote: > Why is txrate in the sta_info structure an int? I think it should be a > small, positive integer. Would it not be better as a u8, or a u16 if you > think a larger range is needed? > u8 is probably fine, but then last_txrate and last_nonerp_idx should be changed to u8 too plus all the stuff referring to the rate indexes. But there's more interesting things to do, like implementing siwrate so we can get rid of the corresponding prism2 ioctl. -Michael Wu
Attachment:
pgp2pOne0gShz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
