On Thursday 10 May 2007 10:56, Larry Finger wrote: > Why has the review of this patch been so strung out? Everything you comment > on here was in versions 1 & 2, but not mentioned in any review of those > versions. > Sorry, I've been busy. I'm pretty sure these issues are the last ones. > As to the usefulness of this function, I am testing in infrastructure, not > ad-hoc, mode, and the output matches the average rate in the log files if > debugging is enabled. If the address in u.sta.bssid is not correct, which > address should I be using? I still maintain that the user is entitled to > know the transmission rate from user space even if debugging is turned off, > and that this function is needed. > I didn't say infrastructure wasn't gonna work. That's the one that should work. However, adhoc probably won't. -Michael Wu
Attachment:
pgpaYsFy739Lv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
