On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 09:53 -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > I personally would not do that. Having conditional fields in > "struct net_device" is very bad, it's a sure way to crash on modules > in some cases. If I remember well, Jeff Garzik has been fighting those > over the years. I'm fine with posting a patch the other way around (i.e. removing the conditional from wireless-dev) just wanted to float this. It originally made much more sense anyway when I had wanted to do cfg80211/wext compatibility in a different way. Now it looks like it'll just depend on wext. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
