Re: [PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Timur Tabi wrote:

A 32-bit counter is absolutely fine. Letting it run with a 400MHz clock
(or was it 200 MHz ?) is the problem. A resolution of 2.5ns for a
watchdog
timer does not really make any sense.

The 10 second limit is based on a 20MHz clock.

No, that's not true. I misread the code. I knew something was wrong, but it didn't click until just now.

The default timeout is 10 seconds. The max timeout on a 20MHz system (which is what we're running) is over 200 seconds.

The problem is that Pratyush's system is running at a clock that's way too fast:

[ 131.187562] sbsa-gwdt sbsa-gwdt.0: Initialized with 40s timeout @ 250000000 Hz, action=1.

250MHz is unreasonable. Pratyush, why is your system counter so high? On our ARM64 system, it's set to 20MHz.

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux