Pratyush Anand wrote:
In fact after supporting max_hw_heartbeat_ms, there should be no change for action=0 functionally. However, we would still need some changes for action=1.
IMHO, action=1 is more of a debugging option, and not something that would be used normally. I would need to see some evidence that real users want to have action=1 and a longer timeout.
I've never been a fan of the action=1 option, and I'm certainly not keen any patches that make action=1 more complicated than it already is.
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
