Re: [PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/05/2016 11:22 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Pratyush Anand wrote:
I think, in the long run we must have SBSA
watchdog specification improvement to keep WOR as 64 bit.

I agree with this 100%.  IMHO, using a 32-bit WOR was just a bad decision.


A 32-bit counter is absolutely fine. Letting it run with a 400MHz clock
(or was it 200 MHz ?) is the problem. A resolution of 2.5ns for a watchdog
timer does not really make any sense.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux