Re: [char-misc-next 4/7] watchdog: mei_wdt: add status debugfs entry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/20/2015 01:44 AM, Winkler, Tomas wrote:

On 12/17/2015 06:49 AM, Tomas Winkler wrote:
Add entry for dumping current watchdog internal state

Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c | 84
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c
index 3c97deb70d90..a3f1c1613c32 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
   #include <linux/slab.h>
   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
   #include <linux/watchdog.h>
+#include <linux/debugfs.h>

   #include <linux/uuid.h>
   #include <linux/mei_cl_bus.h>
@@ -54,6 +55,19 @@ enum mei_wdt_state {
   	MEI_WDT_STOPPING,
   };

+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
+static const char *mei_wdt_state_str(enum mei_wdt_state state)
+{
+	switch (state) {
+	case MEI_WDT_IDLE: return "IDLE";
+	case MEI_WDT_START: return "START";
+	case MEI_WDT_RUNNING: return "RUNNING";
+	case MEI_WDT_STOPPING: return "STOPPING";
+	default: return "unknown";

Doesn't this cause checkpatch warnings ?
It doesn't and also checkpatch.pl  is just a help tool.

I should have said "Doesn't this violate the single-statement-per-line"
coding style rule, but I guess then you'd argue that "case xxx:" is not
a statement.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux