On Tue, 28 Jul, at 04:28:32PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On 07/28/2015 08:00 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > >On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Matt Fleming wrote: > > >>On Tue, 28 Jul, at 12:37:21PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > >>> > > >>>The driver shouldn't be called that either. > > >>> > > >>>You are the only one. What makes iTCO 'special'? > > >> > > >>I don't know, I didn't write it. It looks like Wim did ~9 years ago, so > > >>it must have made sense to him at the time. > > >> > > > > Coding style wasn't as strict then as it is today. iTCO has just been kept > > for historic reasons. > > For sure, I get that, but it doesn't mean we can't do-the-right-thing > (tm) now does it? > > > Sure, we could have changed it to lowercase, but so far no one bothered. > > Plus, of course, there is always the element that some maintainers hate > > that kind of cleanup, > > Really? Yes, really. > Surely any kind of clean-up is good clean-up. Especially as Greg KH > et. al, have been doing public presentations telling everyone that > there is always kernel work for anyone who has the time; spelling > corrections and all. That's what staging/ was invented for ;-) Greg is quite happy to take those patches, other maintainers are less so. > Matt, > > Either do the 5min clean-up or don't, no biggy. If you don't then I > can do it. Go for it. > At the very least please don't add any _new_ camel case variables or > filenames. OK, sure. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
