Re: [PATCH 1/5] iTCO_wdt: Expose watchdog properties using platform data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 Jul, at 12:37:21PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> The driver shouldn't be called that either.
> 
> You are the only one.  What makes iTCO 'special'?

I don't know, I didn't write it. It looks like Wim did ~9 years ago, so
it must have made sense to him at the time.

> > > > +	info = &lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset];
> > > > +
> > > > +	pdata->iTCO_version = info->iTCO_version;
> > > 
> > > Lowercase please.
> > 
> > Hmm... but then this line will read,
> > 
> > 	pdata->itco_version = info->iTCO_version;
> > 
> > I'm not sure that's an improvement.
> 
> Please consider making all of the variable names conform to the
> coding standards we normally abide by.  You can submit it either as
> patch 1 of this set, or independently.

Right, I figured we were fast approaching this rabit hole.
 
-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux