On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:07:51 -0800 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/26/2015 07:44 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > Dear Doug, > > > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:01:37 -0800 > > Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Jisheng, > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >>>> Specifically I see the register WDT_TORR that has an offset of 0x4. > >>>> That's the RANGE_REG in your code. It shows bits 3:0 set the timeout > >>>> period (0 = 0xffff and 15 = 0x7fffffff). It shows bits 31:4 as > >>>> "reserved". > >>> > >>> Could you please dump registers' value at offset 0xf4 and 0xf8 if you > >>> don't mind? > >> > >> Those are not documented in the user manual that I have, but: > >> > >>>>> r(0xff8000f4) > >> 0x10000a02 > >>>>> r(0xff8000f8) > >> 0x3130332a > > > Hi Jisheng, > > This translates to ascii "103*". How does it translate to "1.02a" ? aha, yes. wdt version is v1.03* ;) > > > Thanks. Now I got some information about your platform: > > > > wdt version: v1.02a > > > > WDT_DUAL_TOP is configured as false, so there's no TOP_INIT > > WDT_DFLT_TOP is configured as 0, so it will timeout soon. > > > Any chance you can provide the bit map for the register reporting > those flags ? will do in Doug's v2 patch thread Thanks, Jisheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html