Hi Beniamino, > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:24:11PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Beniamino Galvani wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > I'm not sure why a) this patch was sent to me in the first place and > > > > b) why anyone would think this should go in through MFD? > > > > > > > > > > Hi Lee, > > > > > > from a previous mail [1] I (wrongly) assumed that this was going > > > through the MFD tree. If this is not the case, Wim, can you pick the > > > patch? > > > > > > Beniamino > > > > > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/4/124 > > > > Okay, I see what's happened. > > > > So actually if there are interdependencies between this and the other > > patches in the set, which I think there are, then you should have kept > > this in the set with the others. Sending as an independent patch is > > not the correct thing to do. > > > > Can you resend this, as a patch-set with all of the Acks you have > > acquired please. I will then take the set as a whole. > > The original series had 4 patches: > > - MFD core support > - regulator driver > - watchdog driver > - dts documentation > > As explained in the submission comment, all patches except watchdog > one have already been applied (1 and 4 to MFD tree, 2 to > regulator). Only the watchdog support is missing and it doesn't have > compilation dependencies to other patches (the watchdog driver can't > be enabled without the MFD core support). > > Do you want me to resend the entire patchset or should this go in > through watchdog? I'll add it to the watchdog tree then. Kind regads, Wim. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
