On 05/02/2014 09:10 PM, Don Zickus wrote: > framework. > Implementing read/poll should be easy in the framework. > > Don, are you interested in working on this? i won't be able to get to > it for a bit. > I don't mind doing the work, as long as we agree on an implementation. :-) > > Just throwing an idea out there based on Guenter's reply, should I just > create a new file ipmi_wdt in the drivers/watchdog area that is ported to > the new watchdog framework? Yes, that's what I would do. I definitely belongs in the watchdog directory. > > The idea is if a user pops up that wants the userspace solution that can > fallback to the old ipmi_watchdog currently implemented. Otherwise the > new port would be the recommended way to go? Seeing that the current > driver is updated fairly infrequent, keeping both drivers in sync wouldn't > be to hard. > > Just a random idea. Yes, that's probably a good plan. -corey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
