Hi Thomas, On 11/4/21 1:11 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Srivatsa, > > On Thu, Nov 04 2021 at 12:09, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >> On a related note, I'll be stepping in soon to assist (in place of >> Deep) as a co-maintainer of the PARAVIRT_OPS interface. I had the same >> query about which tree would be best for patches to the paravirt-ops >> code, so I'm glad to see that it got clarified on this thread. > > Welcome to the club. > Thank you! :-) >> I'll also be taking over the maintainership of the VMware hypervisor >> interface. Looking at the git logs, I believe those patches have >> also been handled via the tip tree; so would it be okay to add the >> x86 ML and the tip tree to the VMware hypervisor interface entry too >> in the MAINTAINERS file? > > We've routed them through tip, yes. So yes, that's fine to have a > separate entry in the maintainers file which has you and x86@xxxxxxxxxx > plus the tip tree mentioned. > Awesome, thanks a lot! Regards, Srivatsa _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
