Srivatsa,
On Thu, Nov 04 2021 at 12:09, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On a related note, I'll be stepping in soon to assist (in place of
> Deep) as a co-maintainer of the PARAVIRT_OPS interface. I had the same
> query about which tree would be best for patches to the paravirt-ops
> code, so I'm glad to see that it got clarified on this thread.
Welcome to the club.
> I'll also be taking over the maintainership of the VMware hypervisor
> interface. Looking at the git logs, I believe those patches have
> also been handled via the tip tree; so would it be okay to add the
> x86 ML and the tip tree to the VMware hypervisor interface entry too
> in the MAINTAINERS file?
We've routed them through tip, yes. So yes, that's fine to have a
separate entry in the maintainers file which has you and x86@xxxxxxxxxx
plus the tip tree mentioned.
Thanks,
tglx
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
