Re: swiotlb/virtio: unchecked device dma address and length

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2020/12/15 上午5:49, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 06:31:21PM +0100, Felicitas Hetzelt wrote:
Hello,
Hi! Please see below my responses.

we have been analyzing the Hypervisor-OS interface of Linux
and discovered bugs in the swiotlb/virtio implementation that can be
triggered from a malicious Hypervisor / virtual device.
With SEV, the SWIOTLB implementation is forcefully enabled and would
always be used. Thus, all virtio devices and others would use it under
the hood.

The reason for analyzing this interface is that, technologies such as
Intel's Trusted Domain Extensions [1] and AMD's Secure Nested Paging [2]
change the threat model assumed by various Linux kernel subsystems.
These technologies take the presence of a fully malicious hypervisor
into account and aim to provide protection for virtual machines in such
an environment. Therefore, all input received from the hypervisor or an
external device should be carefully validated. Note that these issues
are of little (or no) relevance in a "normal" virtualization setup,
nevertheless we believe that it is required to fix them if TDX or SNP is
used.

We are happy to provide more information if needed!

[1]
https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/intel-trust-domain-extensions.html

[2]https://www.amd.com/en/processors/amd-secure-encrypted-virtualization

Bug:
OOB memory write.
dma_unmap_single -> swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single is invoked with dma_addr
and length parameters that are under control of the device.
This happens e.g. in virtio_ring:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.10-rc7/source/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c#L378
Heya!

Thank you for pointing this out! I've a couple of questions and hope you can
help me out with them.

Also CC-ing AMD / TDX folks.
This raises two issues:
1) swiotlb_tlb_unmap_single fails to check whether the index generated
from the dma_addr is in range of the io_tlb_orig_addr array.
That is fairly simple to implement I would think. That is it can check
that the dma_addr is from the PA in the io_tlb pool when SWIOTLB=force
is used.


I'm not sure this can fix all the cases. It looks to me we should map descriptor coherent but readonly (which is not supported by current DMA API).

Otherwise, device can modify the desc[i].addr/desc[i].len at any time to pretend a valid mapping.

Thanks




_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux