Re: [PATCH net 2/2] vhost_net: fix high cpu load when sendmsg fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2020/12/15 上午9:48, wangyunjian wrote:
From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@xxxxxxxxxx>

Currently we break the loop and wake up the vhost_worker when
sendmsg fails. When the worker wakes up again, we'll meet the
same error. This will cause high CPU load. To fix this issue,
we can skip this description by ignoring the error. When we
exceeds sndbuf, the return value of sendmsg is -EAGAIN. In
the case we don't skip the description and don't drop packet.

Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/vhost/net.c | 21 +++++++++------------
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index c8784dfafdd7..f966592d8900 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -827,16 +827,13 @@ static void handle_tx_copy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
  				msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_MORE;
  		}
- /* TODO: Check specific error and bomb out unless ENOBUFS? */
  		err = sock->ops->sendmsg(sock, &msg, len);
-		if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
+		if (unlikely(err == -EAGAIN)) {
  			vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
  			vhost_net_enable_vq(net, vq);
  			break;
-		}


As I've pointed out in last version. If you don't discard descriptor, you probably need to add the head to used ring. Otherwise this descriptor will be always inflight that may confuse drivers.


-		if (err != len)
-			pr_debug("Truncated TX packet: len %d != %zd\n",
-				 err, len);
+		} else if (unlikely(err < 0 || err != len))


It looks to me err != len covers err < 0.

Thanks


+			vq_err(vq, "Fail to sending packets err : %d, len : %zd\n", err, len);
  done:
  		vq->heads[nvq->done_idx].id = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, head);
  		vq->heads[nvq->done_idx].len = 0;
@@ -922,7 +919,6 @@ static void handle_tx_zerocopy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
  			msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_MORE;
  		}
- /* TODO: Check specific error and bomb out unless ENOBUFS? */
  		err = sock->ops->sendmsg(sock, &msg, len);
  		if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
  			if (zcopy_used) {
@@ -931,13 +927,14 @@ static void handle_tx_zerocopy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
  				nvq->upend_idx = ((unsigned)nvq->upend_idx - 1)
  					% UIO_MAXIOV;
  			}
-			vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
-			vhost_net_enable_vq(net, vq);
-			break;
+			if (err == -EAGAIN) {
+				vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
+				vhost_net_enable_vq(net, vq);
+				break;
+			}
  		}
  		if (err != len)
-			pr_debug("Truncated TX packet: "
-				 " len %d != %zd\n", err, len);
+			vq_err(vq, "Fail to sending packets err : %d, len : %zd\n", err, len);
  		if (!zcopy_used)
  			vhost_add_used_and_signal(&net->dev, vq, head, 0);
  		else

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux