Re: help? looking for limits on in-flight write operations for virtio-blk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/26/2014 04:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Chris Friesen
<chris.friesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm trying to figure out if there are any limits on how high the inflight
numbers can go, but I'm not having much luck.

I was hopeful when I saw qemu calling virtio_add_queue() with a queue size,
but the queue size was 128 which didn't match the inflight numbers I was
seeing, and after changing the queue size down to 16 I still saw the number
of inflight requests go up to 184 and then the guest took a kernel panic in
virtqueue_add_buf().

Can someone with more knowledge of how virtio block works point me in the
right direction?

You can use QEMU's I/O throttling as a workaround:
qemu -drive ...,iops=64

libvirt has XML syntax for specifying iops limits.  Please see
<iotune> at http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html.

IOPS limits are better than nothing, but not an actual solution. There are two problems that come to mind:

1) If you specify a burst value then a single burst can allocate a bunch of memory and it rarely drops back down after that (due to the usual malloc()/brk() interactions).

2) If the aggregate I/O load is higher than what the server can provide, the number of inflight requests can increase without bounds while still abiding by the configured IOPS value.

What I'd like to see (and may take a stab at implementing) is a cap on either inflight bytes or inflight IOPS. One complication is that this requires hooking into the completion path to update the stats (and possibly unblock the I/O code) when an operation is done.

I have CCed Josh Durgin and Jeff Cody for ideas on reducing
block/rbd.c memory consumption.  Is it possible to pass a
scatter-gather list so I/O can be performed directly on guest memory?
This would also improve performance slightly.

It's not just rbd. I've seen qemu RSS jump by 110MB when accessing qcow2 images on an NFS-mounted filesystem. When the guest is configured with 512MB that's fairly significant.

Chris
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux