Re: [PATCH] virtio-ring: Use threshold for switching to indirect descriptors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/04/2011 06:00 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >  If you
> > copy descriptors, then it goes away.
>
> The avail ring could go away. used could if we make descriptors
> writeable. IIUC it was made RO in the hope that will make it
> easier for xen to adopt. Still relevant?

You mean RO from the consumer side?  Why can't Xen do that?

> > That does suck.  Are there issues in increasing the ring size?  Or
> > making it discontiguous?
>
> discontiguous ring is what indirect is, basically.

No, discontiguous is more cache and prefetch friendly.  With vmap(), the
code doesn't even change.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux