On 12/04/2011 02:01 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > How much better? > > > > I think that if indirects benefit networking, then we're doing something > > wrong. What's going on? Does the ring get filled too early? If so we > > should expand it. > > The ring is physically contigious. > With 256 entries and 64 bytes each, that's already 16K. A descriptor is just 16 bytes. There's also the used ring, but that's a mistake if you have out of order completion. We should have used copying. 16kB worth of descriptors is 1024 entries. With 4kB buffers, that's 4MB worth of data, or 4 ms at 10GbE line speed. With 1500 byte buffers it's just 1.5 ms. In any case I think it's sufficient. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
