On 12/03/2011 01:50 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:16 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:26:42 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:09:37AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 09:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > We'll presumably need some logic to increment is back, > > > > > to account for random workload changes. > > > > > Something like slow start? > > > > > > > > We can increment it each time the queue was less than 10% full, it > > > > should act like slow start, no? > > > > > > No, we really shouldn't get an empty ring as long as things behave > > > well. What I meant is something like: > > > > I was thinking of the network output case, but you're right. We need to > > distinguish between usually full (eg. virtio-net input) and usually > > empty (eg. virtio-net output). > > > > The signal for "we to pack more into the ring" is different. We could > > use some hacky heuristic like "out == 0" but I'd rather make it explicit > > when we set up the virtqueue. > > > > Our other alternative, moving the logic to the driver, is worse. > > > > As to fading the effect over time, that's harder. We have to deplete > > the ring quite a few times before it turns into always-indirect. We > > could back off every time the ring is totally idle, but that may hurt > > bursty traffic. Let's try simple first? > > I tried to take a different approach, and tried putting the indirect > descriptors in a kmem_cache as Michael suggested. The benchmarks showed > that this way virtio-net actually worked faster with indirect on even in > a single stream. How much better? I think that if indirects benefit networking, then we're doing something wrong. What's going on? Does the ring get filled too early? If so we should expand it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
