Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM paravirt_ops infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 31 May 2007 12:11:16 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > > > +       if (wrmsr_safe(MSR_KVM_API_MAGIC, __pa(para_state), 0)) {
> > > > > +               printk(KERN_INFO "KVM guest: WRMSR probe failed.\n");
> > > > > +               return -ENOENT;
> > > > > +       }
> > > > 
> > > > How about printk(KERN_INFO "I am not a KVM guest\n");?
> > > 
> > > Actually paravirt probes that fail should be silent; similar like 
> > > drivers that don't find their hardware should do the same. Otherwise 
> > > if there are later distro kernels with various of those compiled in 
> > > the boot log would become quite noisy
> > 
> > yeah. I suspect printing that it's executing in native mode is OK.
> 
> But only a single printk for that please

Which already exists in paravirt.c:

static void __init default_banner(void)
{
	printk(KERN_INFO "Booting paravirtualized kernel on %s\n",
	       paravirt_ops.name);
}
...
static int __init print_banner(void)
{
	paravirt_ops.banner();
	return 0;
}
core_initcall(print_banner);

Hmm, this will predate your kvm initcall tho, and making that a
pure_initcall is pretty gross...

Cheers,
Rusty.

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux