Rusty Russell wrote: > > BTW, wrt. a new "platform type" field, should it go something like this? > > -0235/3 N/A pad2 Unused > +0235/1 2.07+ platform_type Runtime platform (see below) > +0236/2 N/A pad2 Unused > ... > + platform_type: > + For kernels which can boot on multiple platforms. Currently > + 0 == native (normal), 1 == lguest (paravirtualized). > Well, yes, but we need to think about if there is more things that should be added. There *definitely* should be space for a platform data pointer, to start out with. I would also like to see a platform data field, as well as a bootloader extension field (we're going to have that problem soon enough.) -hpa _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
