Rusty Russell wrote: > > It'd be nicer if there were a "struct boot_params" declaration, but we > can't have everything. It's in my patchset-under-development. (Preview snapshot: http://userweb.kernel.org/~hpa/setup-snapshot-2007.04.30.patch) > diff -r 9a673a220ad6 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c > --- a/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c Mon Apr 30 20:10:26 2007 +1000 > +++ b/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c Tue May 01 13:19:02 2007 +1000 > @@ -30,10 +30,12 @@ > #include <termios.h> > #include <getopt.h> > #include <zlib.h> > +typedef unsigned long long u64; > typedef uint32_t u32; > typedef uint16_t u16; > typedef uint8_t u8; Why not uint64_t to go along with all the other defines? -hpa _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
