On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 10:02 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Reasonable. I think we would have fewer people to yell at if we > restructured things a bit. Sure ... propose a restructure and I'll see if I can fit into it. All voyager really needs is to subvert the entirey of the SMP layer (not being APIC based it needs a complete rewrite of most smp_ function) It also needs some minor things in setup (like catbus config probes and memory setup). > The fact that we have prominent people deliberately ignoring voyager > during development I find disturbing. Heh, I just got used to that ... > In this case I just happened to stumble onto the problem while I was > looking at something else, and decided it wasn't worth doing > development on code that was broken to start with. James _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
