Re: The virtuailization patches break Voyager.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Reasonable.  I think we would have fewer people to yell at if we
> restructured things a bit. 
>
> The fact that we have prominent people deliberately ignoring voyager
> during development I find disturbing. 
>
> In this case I just happened to stumble onto the problem while I was
> looking at something else, and decided it wasn't worth doing
> development on code that was broken to start with.

Well, you've shamed me into fixing it. I'm putting together a
fix-voyager-build patch now.

J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux