James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I got a bit tired of trying to be proactive. The last time was for the > %gs per cpu thing, which I saw coming. The basic problem is that > there's no well organised git tree I can pull from and bisect to trace > problems. > > My strategy now is to wait for the merge window to close and then go > around sweeping up the mess and yelling at the offenders ... it's what > all the non-x86 architectures do, and it's definitely an easier process. Reasonable. I think we would have fewer people to yell at if we restructured things a bit. The fact that we have prominent people deliberately ignoring voyager during development I find disturbing. In this case I just happened to stumble onto the problem while I was looking at something else, and decided it wasn't worth doing development on code that was broken to start with. Eric _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
