On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 01:49 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Less exports good. Consistency with all config options isn't a hard > > requirement: I'd be tempted not to export the pte functions. > > Yes paravirt_ops should be probably split into two for internal and external > available functions. Any takers? Hi Andi! I'm a little uncomfortable with cutting the struct this way: I always thought it'd be a function split if we did one. With the new patch code we could simply shuffle all the exportables to the front and fail to patch calls past this point (then fail the module load). I'll see what I can come up with... Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
