Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/5] Paravirt_ops export.patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 08:28 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Yes.  Has anyone thought more about David Miller's suggesting of just
> using the linker and not doing the fancy binary replacement?
> 
> Especially if you are beginning to reimplement the linker anyway.

Nope.  It doesn't do what we need.  See discussion which followed it.

Rusty.

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux