[RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I've been assuming that it's important that whatever we choose support
> Xen 3.0 as it currently stands.  

Hmm, yes that would be useful. Perhaps there is some way to probe
that works on existing Hypervisors?

> Jeremy's idea that they'll change to 
> using ELF notes suggests that this compatibility is not as important as
> I thought?
>
> As long as all the per-hypervisor magic is contained in the ->ops
> structure, I don't really care *what* it is...

Yep, but the common paths need to be clean too.

-Andi


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux