[RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31 Jul 2006, at 13:15, Rusty Russell wrote:

> I've been assuming that it's important that whatever we choose support
> Xen 3.0 as it currently stands.  Jeremy's idea that they'll change to
> using ELF notes suggests that this compatibility is not as important as
> I thought?

It seems likely we'll be changing our loader to some extent, and we're 
happy to do that if the result is cleaner. It'll mean the kernels will 
not work on older hypervisors (or, at least, older tools), but that's 
probably acceptable as a one-off breakage.

  -- Keir




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux