Heads up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>>> The bigger immediate issue is that we seem to be having an emerging 
>>> tools compatibility problem; all those Index: lines you added will get 
>>> removed when I refresh the patch.  I'm using the mercurial mq 
>>> extension, as is Rusty, and Chris is using a combination of mq and 
>>> quilt.  What are you using?  Why can't it deal with the patches?
>>>       
>> I'm using yap, which is built on top of quilt.  I fixed it to parse the 
>> patches properly, but it still leaves Index: lines when I regenerate 
>> patches, which I can't really help.
>>     
>
> OK, I hacked up a canonicalization script.  Please use this before
> checking in patch changes (just run bin/canonicalize-patches).
>   

There's also the broader issue of different versions / options to patch 
generating different begin / end blobs, which seems to be generating a 
bunch of off by one spacing diffs when I create a patch.  I must admit, 
my tools are fairly primitive, but I've not worked much with either 
patch sets or mercurial in the past, so I've got a bit of coming up to 
speed to do - hence the random hacking to get familiar with the process.

Zach


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux