Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > One could imagine someone wanting to use it in a timing loop or > something, and a 100x or 1000x slowdown might ruin their day. > But it's not really all that important. I don't really see a good > reason to not have a separate sync_core operation, but we can always > add it later if needed. > The bigger immediate issue is that we seem to be having an emerging > tools compatibility problem; all those Index: lines you added will get > removed when I refresh the patch. I'm using the mercurial mq > extension, as is Rusty, and Chris is using a combination of mq and > quilt. What are you using? Why can't it deal with the patches? I'm using yap, which is built on top of quilt. I fixed it to parse the patches properly, but it still leaves Index: lines when I regenerate patches, which I can't really help.
