On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 21:08 -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > One could imagine someone wanting to use it in a timing loop or > > something, and a 100x or 1000x slowdown might ruin their day. > > But it's not really all that important. I don't really see a good > > reason to not have a separate sync_core operation, but we can always > > add it later if needed. > > The bigger immediate issue is that we seem to be having an emerging > > tools compatibility problem; all those Index: lines you added will get > > removed when I refresh the patch. I'm using the mercurial mq > > extension, as is Rusty, and Chris is using a combination of mq and > > quilt. What are you using? Why can't it deal with the patches? > > I'm using yap, which is built on top of quilt. I fixed it to parse the > patches properly, but it still leaves Index: lines when I regenerate > patches, which I can't really help. OK, I hacked up a canonicalization script. Please use this before checking in patch changes (just run bin/canonicalize-patches). Thanks, Rusty. -- Help! Save Australia from the worst of the DMCA: http://linux.org.au/law
