Chris Wright wrote: > * Nivedita Singhvi (niv at us.ibm.com) wrote: > >>Given that everybody who is interested in getting a virtualization >>API into the mainline Linux kernel is on this list, I'd like to >>propose here an additional session (Virtualization BoF) to >>cover specifically virtualization API merge issues. Would >>the interested parties agree to get together and spend time >>pushing this to some sort of successful track? I'll organize, >>if so. > > > Have you checked with ajh to see if there are any BoF slots available (I > thought they were full). If you can find some time, I'll aim to be > there. Ah, I had two days ago, I believe there still were some free at that point - will check again - or see if I can arrange for an informal publike session somewhere. >>What is the current state of mainline inclusion? >> >>Is there a set of tasks/patches/timetable that we can agree >>to prior to KS/OLS? I'm hoping so..and when Rusty gets back >>have him pitch in on the state of his patches.. >> >>Chris? What's happening with the Xen patches? > > > Currently we're still resyncing with 2.6.18-rc1. Jeremy has been ticking > off many items on the todo list. A small number of preparatory patches > have been merged into 2.6.18-rc1. Thanks, Chris - I know I was told this before, but seem to have forgotten - is that todo list up and available for the community to help out on? Also, would it make sense to have a high-level common todo list across all the virtualization approaches in addition? I'll try and get Rusty's todo list up and out on a Wiki page, too, with some info on what he's been trying to accomplish. thanks, Nivedita
