Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > It's also wrong. There's more than one hypervisor and Xen shouldn't just > > > grab this namespace. make it xen_ or xenhv_. > > > > You should reject the recent "hypervisor file system" with the same > > argument then. > > I prefer it would become lparfs or something like that indeed. Yes, it did get renamed to something s390-specific. Also, note http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-01-driver/driver-core-add-sys-hypervisor-when-needed.patch which creates the /sys/hypervisor directory. With the expectation that _all_ hypervisorish subsystems will base their sysfs trees in there.
