On 13 May 2006, at 18:44, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > AFAIC this could go in anytime. It's simple, self-contained and makes > sense even without Xen. > > One minor nit: the IRQ value isn't negated, it's complemented. The > comments need to be fixed. If we really want it disambiguated then we should call it something like 'bitwise-negated' or 'ones-complemented'. 'Complemented' alone is worse than 'negated' imo, since negation is at least the usual name for the tilde operator in C while complementation is an ambiguous term unless you know the base/radix. -- Keir
