On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 04:11:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Note, I don't apply "RFC" patches, and rarely review them. Why are you > claiming that is what this is, when it is in the 3rd version already? This is a new approach from the last patch (dynamic allocation vs. making the static tbuf bigger), so I think that's why Sean was using RFC instead of PATCH. Quite frankly, I'm also confused on when to use RFC vs. PATCH. I'm mentoring Xenia, Sean, Stephanie, and Alex on USB related things, and I want to give them good advice. So, is there documentation on this? Or an email anywhere explaining the norm? SubmittingPatches is no help here. Sarah Sharp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
