Hi, On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:48:26AM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > > Also, this is not *modifying* what was passed, just skipping the xHCI > > > address space so we don't request_mem_region() an area we won't really > > > handle and prevent xhci-hcd.ko from probing. > > > > Hmm? platform_get_resource() returns a pointer to an entry in the > > platform_device's resource[] array. And "res->start +=" modifies the > > entry pointed at. If it didn't, the bug fixed by this patch wouldn't > > have happened. > > > > Are you sure this code will work OK if you build the driver as a module, > > modprobe it, rmmod it, and then modprobe it again? Seems like it won't, > > unless the dev->resource[] array gets reinitialized in between somehow. gotta try that one... Perhaps the correct way would be to copy the resource to a private struct resource and modify that one, leaving pdev->resources untouched. > In addition, I think driver is wasting memory, because on every probe > it will reallocate driver state variable. This also happens in several > other drivers which are using deferred probe. We can't do much about this since we're using devm_* API. Perhaps deferred probe should make sure to destroy the device and add it back later ? Otherwise what's the benefit of using devm_* ? -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature