Am 30.05.2013 20:20, schrieb Sarah Sharp: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:16:34AM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: > The point is that unless Renesas tells us how to know if a host > supports the firmware fetch vendor command, we should stop issuing that > command to the host. I think my contacts at Renesas have moved onto > other jobs, but maybe you know someone there? No, sorry. >> I just dont't like the name, because e.g. in my case, it made me to have >> a deeper look at what that quirk does, because I had the hope it might >> solve a problem. Therefor I think it's useful to rename it. > > I understand. If the command worked fine on all Renesas hosts, I would > be fine with renaming it and printing it with dev_info instead of > xhci_dbg. However, since some Renesas hosts don't support the command, > I'm concerned we may be forced to rip out the code. If you don't do it, > I will have to. I don't want to do it as it works fine on my Renesas upd720202. Instead of removing this feature completely, you could just use the first patch and forget the second one. So only NEC hosts will still have it and I assume there will not any new appear, as they are now Renesas. Another possibility would be to use the device ID too (for Renesas devices), mine has 0x0015. The reason why I really like this feature is that there were already 2-3 firmware updates and since USB 3.0 still isn't that widely used, I assume more will appear if more people actually start using such devices. Regards, Alexander Holler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
