On Monday 13 May 2013 05.44.22 Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:23:55PM +0200, Frederik Schmid wrote: > > On Monday 13 May 2013 05.01.01 Greg KH wrote: > > > Why do the two have any relation to each other, with the exception of > > > possible CPU usage? Are they sharing an interrupt and that is somehow a > > > problem? > > > > They don't have any relation. The reason why we're trying to use the musb > > controller is so that we don't have to share bandwidth on the > > ehci-controller. > I still don't understand, sorry. How does the ehci controller have > anything to do with the ethernet controller that there would be any type > of shared bandwidth issues? They are two different hardware devices, > right? > The ethernet controller sits on the ehci-bus. This chip (OMAP4460) has no on- board MAC. If we were to attach our camera to the ehci-bus we'd need to share bandwidth with ethernet traffic. I hope that makes it clear. Thanks, Frederik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
