On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:46:21PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 02/27/2013 01:43 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:40:51PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > >> On 02/27/2013 01:31 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:27:07PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > >>>> In patch "5d3c28b usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library" > >>>> devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle() was added. It uses try_module_get() to lock the > >>>> phy driver in memory. The corresponding module_put() is missing in that patch. > >>>> > >>>> This patch adds try_module_get() to usb_get_phy() and usb_get_phy_dev(). > >>>> Further the missing module_put() is added to usb_put_phy(). > >>>> > >>>> Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> > >>>> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> this one doesn't apply to my tree. What did you use as a base ? > >> > >> As stated in the cover letter: Greg's usb-next. > >> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git > >> > >> I'd really appreciate if this series goes into a single tree. So that > >> other chipidea developers can base their work on this. > > > > it eventually will all go through Greg's queue, but drivers/usb/phy and > > drivers/usb/otg/ needs to go through my tree so we avoid conflicts > > later, sorry. > > Oh - this is going to be complicated. I'll rip the series into 3 parts > and repost. let's try like this: drivers/usb/otg and drivers/usb/phy which don't create dependencies for chipidea and other patches which create dependencies. Then we can figure out how to handle the dependencies. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
