Re: test procedure for cdc-wdm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> @@ -185,9 +187,17 @@ static void wdm_in_callback(struct urb *urb)
>  	}
>  
>  	desc->rerr = status;
> -	desc->reslength = urb->actual_length;
> -	memmove(desc->ubuf + desc->length, desc->inbuf, desc->reslength);
> -	desc->length += desc->reslength;
> +	if (length + desc->length > desc->wMaxCommand) {
> +		/* The buffer would overflow */
> +		set_bit(WDM_OVERFLOW, &desc->flags);
> +	} else {
> +		/* we may already be in overflow */
> +		if (!test_bit(WDM_OVERFLOW, &desc->flags)) {
> +			memmove(desc->ubuf + desc->length, desc->inbuf, desc->reslength);
> +			desc->length += length;
> +			desc->reslength = length;
> +		}


This is not OK.  Should probably be

 			memmove(desc->ubuf + desc->length, desc->inbuf, length);

?

Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux