Re: About chipidea tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/26/2013 02:25 PM, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> On 02/26/2013 11:56 AM, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>>> Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> Do we have a chipidea repo which is queued for mainline?
>>>> We have several patchsets for chipidea these monthes, I
>>>> don't know their status. For me, I would like based
>>>> on your tree if it exists.
>>>
>>> I thought about it, but then it seems like having a separate branch is
>>> bound to be confusing to most people. I'd much rather prefer everything
>>> go to usb-next, and this is my current plan. Since Greg will start
>>> applying new stuff to usb-next after -rc1 is tagged, I'll send my
>>> current stash of patches for inclusion then. If your patchset, for
>>
>> Can we have a look at your queued patches?
> 
> Sure,
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=135902434508839
> 
>>> example, has conflicts with my stuff that's not merged, I'll try to take
>>> care of resolving the conflicts and submit everything to Greg. In other
>>> words, it should be always ok to base your chipidea patchsets on
>>> usb-next.
>>>
>>> Let me know if this sounds reasonable to you.
>>
>> Michael has already done that work (some S-o-b form Michael are missing)
>> and rebased Sascha's and Peter's patches to current linus/master, see
>> this tree :
>>
>> http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=mgr/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/chipidea-for-v3.10
> 
> Taking a quick look, quite some of those patches are not ready for
> inclusion yet. So if the question is, do we need a -next tree for all
> the chipidea patchsets floating around, it might be a good thing. But
> it's not what Peter was asking in the first place.

I suggest that we have a branch that holds all chipidea patches that are
ready for mainline. Otherwise it's really hard to code any new features

>> The tree includes my patch we resent yesterday, as Sascha's series
>> depends on this.
> 
> Great, I'll take a look.

We can (re)post all patches, so that you can identify the patches ready
for mainline.

Marc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux